What alternative does the owner have for annual reporting on a SWM facility?

The option of submitting reports from a qualified person as an alternative for annual reporting on a Storm Water Management (SWM) facility is grounded in ensuring that the reports are prepared by someone with the requisite knowledge, skills, and experience. This individual typically understands the technical intricacies of stormwater management systems and can accurately assess compliance with relevant regulations and standards.

Having qualified assessments is crucial because it enhances the credibility of the reports, ensuring that they reflect the facility's current operational status and compliance with stormwater management regulations. By relying on a qualified professional, the owner ensures that the reporting process not only meets regulatory expectations but also contributes to effective facility management.

Other alternatives, while they may offer some level of oversight or assessment, do not guarantee the same level of expertise or reliability in reporting. For example, self-assessments may not be as rigorous because they rely on the owner’s understanding and commitment to accurately evaluating the facility. Similarly, hiring an external auditor could be beneficial but may not always be necessary or feasible compared to having reports from a qualified professional who is familiar with the specific requirements of the SWM facility. Spontaneous inspections could provide some insights but are not structured reporting mechanisms for annual compliance, thereby lacking the systematic examination that professional assessments provide.